Saturday, September 27, 2003
Here's The Deal
Ok, I found out why more people have been visiting this blog.
Turns out that it has been linked to from this page.
And the reason the link was created is because of the name.
Some of you might be wondering about the name so I will explain.
First of all, no I am not a member of Aerosmith, (a lot of people think that).
And no, I'm not some geriatric slob who can't control the steady stream of bloody fecal matter streaming from his anus.
The name concerns itself with how the average person is constantly getting figuratively fucked in the ass by the "Man".
By the "Man" I mean the Capitalist Imperialist who run the Western World like a concentration camp.
I have just finished reading Khrushchev Remembers and it has reconfirmed my belief that Marxism is empirical truth.
Capitalism is a product of humanity's immaturity. It is like a disease. It is a loathsome revolting thing fit only for destruction.
Need proof? Ken Lay is a free man. Look at Mircrosoft's punishment for violating anti-trust laws. Look at America's exploitation of
the 3rd world. It's a disgusting sight indeed.
Turns out that it has been linked to from this page.
And the reason the link was created is because of the name.
Some of you might be wondering about the name so I will explain.
First of all, no I am not a member of Aerosmith, (a lot of people think that).
And no, I'm not some geriatric slob who can't control the steady stream of bloody fecal matter streaming from his anus.
The name concerns itself with how the average person is constantly getting figuratively fucked in the ass by the "Man".
By the "Man" I mean the Capitalist Imperialist who run the Western World like a concentration camp.
I have just finished reading Khrushchev Remembers and it has reconfirmed my belief that Marxism is empirical truth.
Capitalism is a product of humanity's immaturity. It is like a disease. It is a loathsome revolting thing fit only for destruction.
Need proof? Ken Lay is a free man. Look at Mircrosoft's punishment for violating anti-trust laws. Look at America's exploitation of
the 3rd world. It's a disgusting sight indeed.
Friday, September 26, 2003
What the fuck is going on?
So I write in my blog once in a while for the amusement of myself and Sandwich Guy, (aka Skippy, aka Gaynor, aka Juanito Corvacho).
And maybe a few people drift over from his blog to see whatever the hell it is that I'm talking about here, (which usually isn't much).
Today, for no particular reason, I checked my site meter stats. Over 35 people visited my blog today.
What the fuck? First of all where the hell did these people get the URL? Second of all, what makes a person visit a site titled, "My Diapers are Bloody"?
The only thing I can think of is that it has something to do with that big porn bust in Germany.
If anyone knows what the deal is, email me.
And maybe a few people drift over from his blog to see whatever the hell it is that I'm talking about here, (which usually isn't much).
Today, for no particular reason, I checked my site meter stats. Over 35 people visited my blog today.
What the fuck? First of all where the hell did these people get the URL? Second of all, what makes a person visit a site titled, "My Diapers are Bloody"?
The only thing I can think of is that it has something to do with that big porn bust in Germany.
If anyone knows what the deal is, email me.
Some people are just wrong
Recently someone has been making comparisons between the Canadian and American constitution.
This person made some very amusing remarks. Now I'm no huge fan of either document, but at the same time
if someone says something that is wrong, I see little point in letting them continue with their erroneous beliefs.
Our friend states the following:
"First we'll look at the U.S Constitution and its attendant amendments. All things being equal, these are fairy straightfoward documents. For the most part, they dictate what the government may not do and what activities they are not to interfere with."
Straightforward documents? If the American constitution was such a straightforward document, then why all the amendments?
The American constitution is a joke. The government routinely ignores it. For example, the first Amendment states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or
of the press..."
Now compare that with the Sedition Act of 1798. Clearly the two conflict with eachother.
Our friend futher stated:
"All you really need to read of the Charter is Section one, it neatly negates the rest of it. It reads as follows:
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society."
How does Section One of the Canadian Charter negate the rest? I think that it is a very clever passage.
It demonstrates an understanding of history. It shows that the people who wrote the Charter understood that societies change and that
the a given society's understanding of it's rights and freedoms might change.
The US constitution appears to have no provision for this. Maybe that's why that country is armed to the teeth.
This person made some very amusing remarks. Now I'm no huge fan of either document, but at the same time
if someone says something that is wrong, I see little point in letting them continue with their erroneous beliefs.
Our friend states the following:
"First we'll look at the U.S Constitution and its attendant amendments. All things being equal, these are fairy straightfoward documents. For the most part, they dictate what the government may not do and what activities they are not to interfere with."
Straightforward documents? If the American constitution was such a straightforward document, then why all the amendments?
The American constitution is a joke. The government routinely ignores it. For example, the first Amendment states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or
of the press..."
Now compare that with the Sedition Act of 1798. Clearly the two conflict with eachother.
Our friend futher stated:
"All you really need to read of the Charter is Section one, it neatly negates the rest of it. It reads as follows:
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society."
How does Section One of the Canadian Charter negate the rest? I think that it is a very clever passage.
It demonstrates an understanding of history. It shows that the people who wrote the Charter understood that societies change and that
the a given society's understanding of it's rights and freedoms might change.
The US constitution appears to have no provision for this. Maybe that's why that country is armed to the teeth.
Saturday, September 13, 2003
The News
New York Times: Pope Struggles to Say Mass in Slovakia - Well duh! Are my wife and I the only ones who noticed that the pope died about 6 years ago and that the Vatican have been carting his carcass around the world with a tape recorder taped to his back and 2 midgets hidden inside of his dress to simulate his movements?
New York Times:U.S. Soldiers Kill 8 Iraqi Policemen, Townspeople Say - Good job with that "reconstruction". I know if I wanted to rebuild a nation that I had just spent the last 12 years destroying I'd send a bunch of uneducated 19 year olds from Iowa armed to the teeth.
New York Times:Wolfowitz Retreats on Al Qaeda Charge - I guess that someone pointed out to Wolfowitz that just saying things don't make them true. There's this thing called evidence that sometimes must be used to substantiate an assertion. Maybe evil clouds the brain. I'm glad you're not running my country.
New York Times:Madonna Says She Felt Friendless at School - This is news? The only valid comment with regaurds to the topic of Madonna is, "Who gives a fuck?".
Toronto Star:`An evil reptilian kitten eater'- As you can probably guess this article concerns Ontario politics. Although this term was applied to only one of the party leaders, it could apply to any. Ever been to the Ontario Parliment? If you have you've probably wondered why there are no cats there. Now you know.
Toronto Star:Eves and McGuinty trade health warnings- It appears that they are both accusing the other of giving them herpies.
New York Times:U.S. Soldiers Kill 8 Iraqi Policemen, Townspeople Say - Good job with that "reconstruction". I know if I wanted to rebuild a nation that I had just spent the last 12 years destroying I'd send a bunch of uneducated 19 year olds from Iowa armed to the teeth.
New York Times:Wolfowitz Retreats on Al Qaeda Charge - I guess that someone pointed out to Wolfowitz that just saying things don't make them true. There's this thing called evidence that sometimes must be used to substantiate an assertion. Maybe evil clouds the brain. I'm glad you're not running my country.
New York Times:Madonna Says She Felt Friendless at School - This is news? The only valid comment with regaurds to the topic of Madonna is, "Who gives a fuck?".
Toronto Star:`An evil reptilian kitten eater'- As you can probably guess this article concerns Ontario politics. Although this term was applied to only one of the party leaders, it could apply to any. Ever been to the Ontario Parliment? If you have you've probably wondered why there are no cats there. Now you know.
Toronto Star:Eves and McGuinty trade health warnings- It appears that they are both accusing the other of giving them herpies.
Friday, September 12, 2003
Allende: The First Victim of Sept. 11th
September 11th is an interesting day. There are two events in modern history that occurred on that day which are seemingly unrelated, but I believe are.
In 1973 the democratically elected government of Chile was overthrown in a violent, American sponsored coup.
In 2001 foreign nationals hijacked commercial air planes and smashed them into the World Trade Center and Pentagon.
How are these related? I believe that the Chile incident is a good example of how the American government commits crimes against other nations, interferes in their internal politics using tactics such as murder, to futher it's own goals of imperialist exploitation.
The World Trade Center/Pentagon incidents are a direct response to that imperialist exploitation.
Americans have their own government to thank for what happened at the World Trade Center/Pentagon. Their "War On Terror" should begin with their government taking responsibility for it's role in international events.
Two sites of interest:
Truth Commission
Declassified Documents Relating to the Military Coup, September 11, 1973
In 1973 the democratically elected government of Chile was overthrown in a violent, American sponsored coup.
In 2001 foreign nationals hijacked commercial air planes and smashed them into the World Trade Center and Pentagon.
How are these related? I believe that the Chile incident is a good example of how the American government commits crimes against other nations, interferes in their internal politics using tactics such as murder, to futher it's own goals of imperialist exploitation.
The World Trade Center/Pentagon incidents are a direct response to that imperialist exploitation.
Americans have their own government to thank for what happened at the World Trade Center/Pentagon. Their "War On Terror" should begin with their government taking responsibility for it's role in international events.
Two sites of interest:
Truth Commission
Declassified Documents Relating to the Military Coup, September 11, 1973
Thursday, September 11, 2003
Yes, it's true.
This morning during my usual romp around the web I stopped in once again at Ann Coulter's site to review a few of her "columns".
It turns out that my initial assessment of Ms. Coulter wasn't entirely accurate. At first I thought that she was just stupid. Turns out she's evil too. In this woman demented world there are two types of people; "Republicans" and "liberals". Now in this fantasy world the Republicans are correct no matter what they do or say, and the liberals are wrong no matter what they do or say. Whatever America does is right, anyone who disagrees for any reason is wrong. It sounds like a world invented by a 6 year old.
Marxism is wrong, Ronald Regan was right. And you know Regan defeated the Soviet Union. The Muslims are bad because their religion instructs them to kill people. The good Christian people of the world would never do that. Their religious texts are only filled with love and kindness to all peoples.
The American government should not abide by the Geneva Convention because other's don't. What is this? Four year olds pointing fingers at eachother, screaming "You started it!". It seems to me that the USA has never had much use for the "rules" of war. Vietnam is the most prominent example. According to Ms. Coulter's logic, one is justified in acting as immorally as those who oppose them. Well if that's the case, what's the point of having morals? For Ms. Coulter I guess there is none. Good job Ann. You're a great example of what America is all about.
It turns out that my initial assessment of Ms. Coulter wasn't entirely accurate. At first I thought that she was just stupid. Turns out she's evil too. In this woman demented world there are two types of people; "Republicans" and "liberals". Now in this fantasy world the Republicans are correct no matter what they do or say, and the liberals are wrong no matter what they do or say. Whatever America does is right, anyone who disagrees for any reason is wrong. It sounds like a world invented by a 6 year old.
Marxism is wrong, Ronald Regan was right. And you know Regan defeated the Soviet Union. The Muslims are bad because their religion instructs them to kill people. The good Christian people of the world would never do that. Their religious texts are only filled with love and kindness to all peoples.
The American government should not abide by the Geneva Convention because other's don't. What is this? Four year olds pointing fingers at eachother, screaming "You started it!". It seems to me that the USA has never had much use for the "rules" of war. Vietnam is the most prominent example. According to Ms. Coulter's logic, one is justified in acting as immorally as those who oppose them. Well if that's the case, what's the point of having morals? For Ms. Coulter I guess there is none. Good job Ann. You're a great example of what America is all about.
Wednesday, September 10, 2003
I just can't believe it!!
I think that I have discovered the most mentally deficient human alive. I use to think it could be anyone who worked for Canada Post, but it turns out I was wrong. It's Ann Coulter.
I saw her briefly on CNN this evening, speaking to the equally stupid Paula Zahn, and I just couldn't believe what I heard. It had to be a joke. No one in their right mind would suggest that the USA should do as it pleases in the world with no consideration to other nations. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to conclude that as the USA isolates itself politically it will also isolate itself economically. For an economy based on foreign trade that's not a really smart move. Even Bush Jr. knows this. But sure enough, there was this woman on my TV suggesting just that. At first I wondered how someone that stupid could even get on TV and then I remembered "Everybody Loves Raymond".
So I looked this Coulter person up on the internet. And sure enough I found her site with little trouble. I read a few of her columns, as she so generously calls them. Insane ravings would be more accurate. This woman goes as far as defending Joe McCarthy. I'll look a little more and I'm sure there's got to be a "Hitler wasn't all bad" comment somewhere in there.
I use to believe in freedom of speech. Then I read Ann Coulter.
I saw her briefly on CNN this evening, speaking to the equally stupid Paula Zahn, and I just couldn't believe what I heard. It had to be a joke. No one in their right mind would suggest that the USA should do as it pleases in the world with no consideration to other nations. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to conclude that as the USA isolates itself politically it will also isolate itself economically. For an economy based on foreign trade that's not a really smart move. Even Bush Jr. knows this. But sure enough, there was this woman on my TV suggesting just that. At first I wondered how someone that stupid could even get on TV and then I remembered "Everybody Loves Raymond".
So I looked this Coulter person up on the internet. And sure enough I found her site with little trouble. I read a few of her columns, as she so generously calls them. Insane ravings would be more accurate. This woman goes as far as defending Joe McCarthy. I'll look a little more and I'm sure there's got to be a "Hitler wasn't all bad" comment somewhere in there.
I use to believe in freedom of speech. Then I read Ann Coulter.
ACK!
Well, as I'm sure you've already heard, Warren Zevon is dead. Are there any white guys left in modern music who haven't been perverted by one group of mud people or another?
I should have found out about my job already, but I haven't. They should have told us whether we'd be around longer or not, but really I don't give a shit as long as they keep paying me.
Bush need another $87 billion to keep destroying already half destroyed countries.
It was really funny watch Rice on TV yesterday pontificating on how the infrastructure in Iraq was even worse than they had thought before they destroyed most of it.
Well, duh! There have been American sponsered sanctions against the country for over 10 years. What the hell did you expect it to be like?
They removed the Ten Commandments from that courthouse in, where the hell was it? Alabama? Some God-awful place like that. What was really funny or frightening about that whole thing, (depending on how you look at it), was the fact that the Ten Commandments forbid idol worship. Yet here are all these people cying and pissing and protesting, because the state wants to remove a big chunk of stone. More proof that Christianity isn't a religion at all, but just another form of paganism. How pathetic.
I should have found out about my job already, but I haven't. They should have told us whether we'd be around longer or not, but really I don't give a shit as long as they keep paying me.
Bush need another $87 billion to keep destroying already half destroyed countries.
It was really funny watch Rice on TV yesterday pontificating on how the infrastructure in Iraq was even worse than they had thought before they destroyed most of it.
Well, duh! There have been American sponsered sanctions against the country for over 10 years. What the hell did you expect it to be like?
They removed the Ten Commandments from that courthouse in, where the hell was it? Alabama? Some God-awful place like that. What was really funny or frightening about that whole thing, (depending on how you look at it), was the fact that the Ten Commandments forbid idol worship. Yet here are all these people cying and pissing and protesting, because the state wants to remove a big chunk of stone. More proof that Christianity isn't a religion at all, but just another form of paganism. How pathetic.